Where did you hear that, Fox News?ofblong said:what the movie doesnt show is what really happens over there in iraq. it doesnt show that 90%(I am probably off on this figure but you get the idea) of the iraqi's are actually glad to see us.
I question whether that is possibleIt makes bush look worse than he really is.
It may be one sided, showing only the bad, but that doesn't make the wrong's right. Enron did some things right, so did the Soviet Union under communism, so does Cuba today. The fact that Cuba has the best third world health care in Latin America doesn't make their evil acceptable.It is a very poor portrayal of what things are really like. it only shows the bad and none of the good. There is more good going on than bad. Even the news makes it sound worse than it really is.
At least you admit Bush is a liar and a cheat.John Kerry does not get my vote. He is a bigger liar and cheat than bush is.
The movie is pretty much just about Iraq and 9/11i know the movie isnt about just iraq but you know what im saying.
That sounds like paranoia. We all know that when nuclear weapons are outlawed only outlaws will have them. I'm building a WMD in my basement cause its my constitutional right.To me Kerry is another al gore just waiting to take our guns and rights away from us.
What you are leaving out is how much lower than ours their crime rate is even after a 300% increase that may be from other causes, but I won't argue that here.I dont want this country to end up like australia. Australia banned all guns and in so doing crime went up over 300%. Most of that is rapings and theft.
I just wish it hadn't left out the tremendous damage to the nation's future from a tax cut that went mostly to the wealthy, sadling us with huge deficits, as far as the eye can see... The lies about social security...sorry I about the rambling. I just wish the movie would have shown at least the good stuff happening(which there is alot) instead of nothing but the bad stuff. I guess the best way to describe the movie is that it is biased.
daveNandi said:Where did you hear that, Fox News?
NO from actual solderies who have been there not some news show that shows only partial truths. thats why I dont watch the news.
At least you admit Bush is a liar and a cheat. yes so has every other president we have had.
That sounds like paranoia. We all know that when nuclear weapons are outlawed only outlaws will have them. I'm building a WMD in my basement cause its my constitutional right. Bush used 9/11 to take away many of our rights with the patriot act. The supreme court just had to tell him that he can't call me an enemy combatant and hold me forever without trial.
why do you think china hasnt tried to invade us again? Because we have lots of fire power even amoung the civilian population. In no way am I paranoid but I would like to be able to defend myself in a time of emergency. There is no way I will beat someone that has a gun if all I have is a knife.
What you are leaving out is how much lower their crime rate is even after a 300% increase that may be from other causes.
your rational doesnt make sense. how can they have a lower crime rate yet the crime rate has increased 300%? yes shootings have been lowered but everything else like rapings have gone up. hmm do I want the women around me to fear for their life they might get raped or let them have a gun to shoot(not necessarily kill) an attacker. I think id rather they had a gun to fend themselves. not saying its just women getting raped as that isnt true as men do also but not as to a degree as women do.
I just wish it hadn't left out the tremendous damage to the nation's future from a tax cut that went mostly to the wealthy, sadling us with huge deficits, as far as the eye can see... The lies about social security... cant say much bout ss as I probably wont have it when im old enough to claim it. thus my reasoning for putting $$$ in other places of interest.Also the wealthy may have gotten a tax cut but they still pay a heck of alot more in taxes than you could even imagine. I wish I had one years worth of taxes some of the rich pay in every year. hmm I pay 15% in taxes yet my father-in-law pays 33% in taxes. lets see who pays more?
I absolutely agree, 100%. However, I do not believe the middle class is squeezed because of the rich, but because of the poor. The rich are already taxed quite highly, and you cannot simply blam them for all the money problems in the world simply because they have money and others do not. The poor are not taxed at all. Government, especially democrates but both parties in general like to give and give and give to the poor, either by tax cuts, increased benefits whatever. But us middle class see little if any of those tax cuts or benefits and after all the taxes, most of which goes to support the poor, the middle class is not much better off than the poor.However my point is that the middle class gets squuezed like a turnip all the time. ask any small buisness owner and I am sure we will get a book back on the hoops they jump through just to stay alive.
I get complaints all the time for stating that very thing. Most people do not understand this, and when you try and explain it to them, do not want to believe it. A country this size simply could not be a democracy. Particularly with so few who actually vote, and even fewer who actually make educated votes as opposed to simply voting republican or democratic or voting based on soundbite advertising or for recognizable last names. It is definately too bad, but this is probably the only way our system could work and retain any viability.And for the people that call this a democracy.... It's not! it's a republic.
Well I look at it this way. I grew up in a shack until I was around 12 years old when I was taken away and put into foster care. My real parents still live in a shack. I on the other hand had a middle class family take me in and give me proper care. you know a roof food etc etc. I now have a house kids wife car etc. dunno what im trying to say just putting that out there =].Mike said:in terms of taxes and the "poor". I think in this way. Some people make a bed and they should sleep in it. others have factors beyond their control and need help to crawl out of a bed that was made for them. poverty is a form of oppression and by keeping people poor you limit their access to higher education not by limiting funds but rather by breaking their spirit. poverty is a tool, a tool that is used often. by making the middle class responsible for the poor you foster and breed resentment towrds them and further enhance the socail stigma of poverty, which in turn keeps the spirit of the poor broken.
to devide a people on economic basis is more powerful than the other methods. because money is power in america. if you have it you have some control if you do not then you have no voice.
the poor are the silent and forgotten voices of america.
only a select few can be rich but like a pyramid the bottom has to be larger to support that select few on top. the rich are rich on the backs of the poor and the middle class bears the weight in between.